Comparing Direct and Indirect Representations for Environment-Specific Robot Component Design

21 Jan 2019  ·  Jack Collins, Ben Cottier, David Howard ·

We compare two representations used to define the morphology of legs for a hexapod robot, which are subsequently 3D printed. A leg morphology occupies a set of voxels in a voxel grid. One method, a direct representation, uses a collection of Bezier splines. The second, an indirect method, utilises CPPN-NEAT. In our first experiment, we investigate two strategies to post-process the CPPN output and ensure leg length constraints are met. The first uses an adaptive threshold on the output neuron, the second, previously reported in the literature, scales the largest generated artefact to our desired length. In our second experiment, we build on our past work that evolves the tibia of a hexapod to provide environment-specific performance benefits. We compare the performance of our direct and indirect legs across three distinct environments, represented in a high-fidelity simulator. Results are significant and support our hypothesis that the indirect representation allows for further exploration of the design space leading to improved fitness.

PDF Abstract
No code implementations yet. Submit your code now

Tasks


Datasets


  Add Datasets introduced or used in this paper

Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here