Search Results for author:
Found 7 papers, 0 papers with code
Strategic Argumentation Dialogues for Persuasion: Framework and Experiments Based on Modelling the Beliefs and Concerns of the Persuadee
Persuasion is an important and yet complex aspect of human intelligence.
Polynomial-time Updates of Epistemic States in a Fragment of Probabilistic Epistemic Argumentation (Technical Report)
Probabilistic epistemic argumentation allows for reasoning about argumentation problems in a way that is well founded by probability theory.
Domain Modelling in Computational Persuasion for Behaviour Change in Healthcare
At the core of this proposal is an ontology which provides a representation of key factors, in particular kinds of belief, which we have identified in the behaviour change literature as being important in diverse behaviour change initiatives.
Epistemic Graphs for Representing and Reasoning with Positive and Negative Influences of Arguments
Furthermore, the flexibility of the epistemic approach allows us to both model the rationale behind the existing semantics as well as completely deviate from them when required.
Empirical Evaluation of Abstract Argumentation: Supporting the Need for Bipolar and Probabilistic Approaches
It is equipped with a wide range of postulates, including those that do not make any restrictions concerning how initial arguments should be viewed, thus potentially being more adequate for handling beliefs of the people that have not fully disclosed their opinions in comparison to Dung's semantics.
Understanding the Abstract Dialectical Framework (Preliminary Report)
Among the most general structures extending the framework by Dung are the abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs).
Extension-based Semantics of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks
In this paper we introduce a new method to ensure acyclicity of the chosen arguments and present a family of extension-based semantics built on it.
