Search Results for author:
Found 13 papers, 12 papers with code
Advancing LLM Reasoning Generalists with Preference Trees
We introduce Eurus, a suite of large language models (LLMs) optimized for reasoning.
Controllable Preference Optimization: Toward Controllable Multi-Objective Alignment
In practice, the multifaceted nature of human preferences inadvertently introduces what is known as the "alignment tax" -a compromise where enhancements in alignment within one objective (e. g., harmlessness) can diminish performance in others (e. g., helpfulness).
Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM Agents
LLM agents are typically prompted to produce actions by generating JSON or text in a pre-defined format, which is usually limited by constrained action space (e. g., the scope of pre-defined tools) and restricted flexibility (e. g., inability to compose multiple tools).
Examining LLMs' Uncertainty Expression Towards Questions Outside Parametric Knowledge
Can large language models (LLMs) express their uncertainty in situations where they lack sufficient parametric knowledge to generate reasonable responses?
UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with High-quality Feedback
However, the scarcity of diverse, naturalistic datasets of human preferences on LLM outputs at scale poses a great challenge to RLHF as well as feedback learning research within the open-source community.
CRAFT: Customizing LLMs by Creating and Retrieving from Specialized Toolsets
It creates toolsets specifically curated for the tasks and equips LLMs with a component that retrieves tools from these sets to enhance their capability to solve complex tasks.
MINT: Evaluating LLMs in Multi-turn Interaction with Tools and Language Feedback
However, current evaluation protocols often emphasize benchmark performance with single-turn exchanges, neglecting the nuanced interactions among the user, LLMs, and external tools, while also underestimating the importance of natural language feedback from users.
Revisiting Out-of-distribution Robustness in NLP: Benchmark, Analysis, and LLMs Evaluations
Then we introduce BOSS, a Benchmark suite for Out-of-distribution robustneSS evaluation covering 5 tasks and 20 datasets.
From Adversarial Arms Race to Model-centric Evaluation: Motivating a Unified Automatic Robustness Evaluation Framework
In our experiments, we conduct a robustness evaluation of RoBERTa models to demonstrate the effectiveness of our evaluation framework, and further show the rationality of each component in the framework.
A Close Look into the Calibration of Pre-trained Language Models
We observe a consistent change in calibration performance across six factors.
FactMix: Using a Few Labeled In-domain Examples to Generalize to Cross-domain Named Entity Recognition
Few-shot Named Entity Recognition (NER) is imperative for entity tagging in limited resource domains and thus received proper attention in recent years.
A Unified Evaluation of Textual Backdoor Learning: Frameworks and Benchmarks
However, we highlight two issues in previous backdoor learning evaluations: (1) The differences between real-world scenarios (e. g. releasing poisoned datasets or models) are neglected, and we argue that each scenario has its own constraints and concerns, thus requires specific evaluation protocols; (2) The evaluation metrics only consider whether the attacks could flip the models' predictions on poisoned samples and retain performances on benign samples, but ignore that poisoned samples should also be stealthy and semantic-preserving.
Bridge the Gap Between CV and NLP! A Gradient-based Textual Adversarial Attack Framework
In this paper, we instantiate our framework with an attack algorithm named Textual Projected Gradient Descent (T-PGD).
