Search Results for author:
Found 6 papers, 0 papers with code
Contribution Functions for Quantitative Bipolar Argumentation Graphs: A Principle-based Analysis
We present a principle-based analysis of contribution functions for quantitative bipolar argumentation graphs that quantify the contribution of one argument to another.
Argumentative XAI: A Survey
Explainable AI (XAI) has been investigated for decades and, together with AI itself, has witnessed unprecedented growth in recent years.
Complexity Results and Algorithms for Bipolar Argumentation
Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (BAFs) admit several interpretations of the support relation and diverging definitions of semantics.
Resolving Conflicts in Clinical Guidelines using Argumentation
We advance a structured argumentation formalism for reasoning with conflicting clinical guidelines, patient-specific information and preferences.
Argumentation for Explainable Scheduling (Full Paper with Proofs)
Specifically, we define argumentative and natural language explanations for why a schedule is (not) feasible, (not) efficient or (not) satisfying fixed user decisions, based on models of the fundamental makespan scheduling problem in terms of abstract argumentation frameworks (AFs).
ABA+: Assumption-Based Argumentation with Preferences
We present ABA+, a new approach to handling preferences in a well known structured argumentation formalism, Assumption-Based Argumentation (ABA).
