Unraveling the graph structure of tabular data through Bayesian and spectral analysis

4 Oct 2021  ·  Bruno Messias F. de Resende, Eric K. Tokuda, Luciano da Fontoura Costa ·

In the big-data age, tabular data are being generated and analyzed everywhere. As a consequence, finding and understanding the relationships between the features in these data are of great relevance. Here, to encompass these relationships, we propose a graph-based method that allows individual, group and multi-scale analyses. The method starts by mapping the tabular data into a weighted directed graph using the Shapley additive explanations technique. With this graph of relationships, we show that the inference of the hierarchical modular structure obtained by the Nested Stochastic Block Model (nSBM) as well as the study of the spectral space of the magnetic Laplacian can help us identify the classes of features and unravel non-trivial relationships. As a case study, we analyzed a socioeconomic survey conducted with students in Brazil: the PeNSE survey. The spectral embedding of the columns suggested that questions related to physical activities form a separate group. The application of the nSBM approach not only corroborated with that but allowed complementary findings about the modular structure: some groups of questions showed a high adherence with the divisions qualitatively defined by the designers of the survey. As opposed to the structure obtained by the spectrum, questions from the class Safety were partly grouped by our method in the class Drugs. Surprisingly, by inspecting these questions, we observed that they were related to both these topics, suggesting an alternative interpretation of these questions. These results show how our method can provide guidance for tabular data analysis as well as the design of future surveys.

PDF Abstract
No code implementations yet. Submit your code now

Datasets


  Add Datasets introduced or used in this paper

Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here