Speech Enhancement based on Denoising Autoencoder with Multi-branched Encoders

Deep learning-based models have greatly advanced the performance of speech enhancement (SE) systems. However, two problems remain unsolved, which are closely related to model generalizability to noisy conditions: (1) mismatched noisy condition during testing, i.e., the performance is generally sub-optimal when models are tested with unseen noise types that are not involved in the training data; (2) local focus on specific noisy conditions, i.e., models trained using multiple types of noises cannot optimally remove a specific noise type even though the noise type has been involved in the training data. These problems are common in real applications. In this paper, we propose a novel denoising autoencoder with a multi-branched encoder (termed DAEME) model to deal with these two problems. In the DAEME model, two stages are involved: offline and online. In the offline stage, we build multiple component models to form a multi-branched encoder based on a dynamically-sized decision tree(DSDT). The DSDT is built based on a prior knowledge of speech and noisy conditions (the speaker, environment, and signal factors are considered in this paper), where each component of the multi-branched encoder performs a particular mapping from noisy to clean speech along the branch in the DSDT. Finally, a decoder is trained on top of the multi-branched encoder. In the online stage, noisy speech is first processed by the tree and fed to each component model. The multiple outputs from these models are then integrated into the decoder to determine the final enhanced speech. Experimental results show that DAEME is superior to several baseline models in terms of objective evaluation metrics and the quality of subjective human listening tests.

PDF Abstract
No code implementations yet. Submit your code now

Datasets


  Add Datasets introduced or used in this paper

Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods