Sparse Unsupervised Capsules Generalize Better
We show that unsupervised training of latent capsule layers using only the reconstruction loss, without masking to select the correct output class, causes a loss of equivariances and other desirable capsule qualities. This implies that supervised capsules networks can't be very deep. Unsupervised sparsening of latent capsule layer activity both restores these qualities and appears to generalize better than supervised masking, while potentially enabling deeper capsules networks. We train a sparse, unsupervised capsules network of similar geometry to Sabour et al (2017) on MNIST, and then test classification accuracy on affNIST using an SVM layer. Accuracy is improved from benchmark 79% to 90%.
PDF Abstract
Datasets
MNIST
Results from the Paper
Submit
results from this paper
to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the
community compare results to other papers.
