Selective In-Context Data Augmentation for Intent Detection using Pointwise V-Information

This work focuses on in-context data augmentation for intent detection. Having found that augmentation via in-context prompting of large pre-trained language models (PLMs) alone does not improve performance, we introduce a novel approach based on PLMs and pointwise V-information (PVI), a metric that can measure the usefulness of a datapoint for training a model. Our method first fine-tunes a PLM on a small seed of training data and then synthesizes new datapoints - utterances that correspond to given intents. It then employs intent-aware filtering, based on PVI, to remove datapoints that are not helpful to the downstream intent classifier. Our method is thus able to leverage the expressive power of large language models to produce diverse training data. Empirical results demonstrate that our method can produce synthetic training data that achieve state-of-the-art performance on three challenging intent detection datasets under few-shot settings (1.28% absolute improvement in 5-shot and 1.18% absolute in 10-shot, on average) and perform on par with the state-of-the-art in full-shot settings (within 0.01% absolute, on average).

PDF Abstract

Results from the Paper


Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Global Rank Benchmark
Intent Detection BANKING77 RoBERTa-Large + ICDA Accuracy (%) 94.42 # 1
Text Classification BANKING77 RoBERTa-Large + ICDA Accuracy 94.42 # 1
Intent Detection BANKING77 10-shot RoBERTa-Large + ICDA Accuracy (%) 89.79 # 1
Intent Detection BANKING77 5-shot RoBERTa-Large + ICDA Accuracy (%) 84.01 # 1
Intent Detection CLINC150 RoBERTa-Large + ICDA Accuracy (%) 97.12 # 1
Intent Detection CLINC150 10-shot RoBERTa-Large + ICDA Accuracy (%) 94.84 # 1
Intent Detection CLINC150 5-shot RoBERTa-Large + ICDA Accuracy (%) 92.62 # 1
Intent Detection HWU64 RoBERTa-Large + ICDA Accuracy (%) 92.57 # 1
Intent Detection HWU64 10-shot RoBERTa-Large + ICDA Accuracy (%) 87.41 # 1
Intent Detection HWU64 5-shot RoBERTa-Large + ICDA Accuracy (%) 82.45 # 1

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here