Exploring Generalizable Distillation for Efficient Medical Image Segmentation

26 Jul 2022  ·  Xingqun Qi, Zhuojie Wu, Min Ren, Muyi Sun, Caifeng Shan, Zhenan Sun ·

Efficient medical image segmentation aims to provide accurate pixel-wise predictions for medical images with a lightweight implementation framework. However, lightweight frameworks generally fail to achieve superior performance and suffer from poor generalizable ability on cross-domain tasks. In this paper, we explore the generalizable knowledge distillation for the efficient segmentation of cross-domain medical images. Considering the domain gaps between different medical datasets, we propose the Model-Specific Alignment Networks (MSAN) to obtain the domain-invariant representations. Meanwhile, a customized Alignment Consistency Training (ACT) strategy is designed to promote the MSAN training. Considering the domain-invariant representative vectors in MSAN, we propose two generalizable knowledge distillation schemes for cross-domain distillation, Dual Contrastive Graph Distillation (DCGD) and Domain-Invariant Cross Distillation (DICD). Specifically, in DCGD, two types of implicit contrastive graphs are designed to represent the intra-coupling and inter-coupling semantic correlations from the perspective of data distribution. In DICD, the domain-invariant semantic vectors from the two models (i.e., teacher and student) are leveraged to cross-reconstruct features by the header exchange of MSAN, which achieves improvement in the generalization of both the encoder and decoder in the student model. Furthermore, a metric named Frechet Semantic Distance (FSD) is tailored to verify the effectiveness of the regularized domain-invariant features. Extensive experiments conducted on the Liver and Retinal Vessel Segmentation datasets demonstrate the superiority of our method, in terms of performance and generalization on lightweight frameworks.

PDF Abstract

Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods