Rethinking Channel Dimensions for Efficient Model Design

Designing an efficient model within the limited computational cost is challenging. We argue the accuracy of a lightweight model has been further limited by the design convention: a stage-wise configuration of the channel dimensions, which looks like a piecewise linear function of the network stage. In this paper, we study an effective channel dimension configuration towards better performance than the convention. To this end, we empirically study how to design a single layer properly by analyzing the rank of the output feature. We then investigate the channel configuration of a model by searching network architectures concerning the channel configuration under the computational cost restriction. Based on the investigation, we propose a simple yet effective channel configuration that can be parameterized by the layer index. As a result, our proposed model following the channel parameterization achieves remarkable performance on ImageNet classification and transfer learning tasks including COCO object detection, COCO instance segmentation, and fine-grained classifications. Code and ImageNet pretrained models are available at https://github.com/clovaai/rexnet.

PDF Abstract CVPR 2021 PDF CVPR 2021 Abstract

Results from the Paper


Ranked #293 on Image Classification on ImageNet (using extra training data)

     Get a GitHub badge
Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Global Rank Uses Extra
Training Data
Result Benchmark
Image Classification ImageNet ReXNet-R_3.0 Top 1 Accuracy 84.5% # 293
Number of params 34.8M # 660
Image Classification ImageNet ReXNet-R_2.0 Top 1 Accuracy 83.2% # 413
Number of params 16.5M # 520
Image Classification ImageNet ReXNet_2.0 Top 1 Accuracy 81.6% # 569
Number of params 19M # 528
GFLOPs 1.5 # 132
Image Classification ImageNet ReXNet_1.0 Top 1 Accuracy 77.9% # 792
Number of params 4.8M # 394
GFLOPs 0.40 # 43
Image Classification ImageNet ReXNet_0.6 Top 1 Accuracy 74.6% # 902
Number of params 2.7M # 363
Image Classification ImageNet ReXNet_0.9 Top 1 Accuracy 77.2% # 813
Number of params 4.1M # 381
GFLOPs 0.35 # 35
Image Classification ImageNet ReXNet_1.3 Top 1 Accuracy 79.5% # 691
Number of params 7.6M # 458
GFLOPs 0.66 # 79
Image Classification ImageNet ReXNet_1.5 Top 1 Accuracy 80.3% # 649
Number of params 9.7M # 474
GFLOPs 0.86 # 99
Image Classification ImageNet ReXNet_3.0 Top 1 Accuracy 82.8% # 453
Number of params 34.7M # 658
GFLOPs 3.4 # 178

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here