Revisiting Quantization Error in Face Alignment

ICCV Workshop 2021  ·  Xing Lan, Qinghao Hu, Jian Cheng ·

Recently, heatmap regression models have become the mainstream in locating facial landmarks. To keep com- putation affordable and reduce memory usage, the whole procedure involves downsampling from the raw image to the output heatmap. However, how much impact will the quantization error introduced by downsampling bring? The problem is hardly systematically investigated among previ- ous works. This work fills the blank and we are the first to quantitatively analyze the negative gain. The statistical re- sults show the NME generated by quantization error is even larger than 1/3 of the SOTA item, which is a serious obsta- cle for making a new breakthrough in face alignment. To compensate for the impact of quantization effect, we pro- pose a novel method, called Heatmap In Heatmap (HIH), which leverages two categories of heatmaps as label repre- sentation to encode the coordinate. And in HIH, the range of one heatmap represents a pixel of the other category of heatmap. Also, we even combine the face alignment with solutions of other fields to make a comparison. Extensive experiments on various benchmarks show the feasibility of HIH and superior performance than other solutions. More- over, the mean error reaches to 4.18 on WFLW, which ex- ceeds SOTA a lot.

PDF Abstract
No code implementations yet. Submit your code now

Results from the Paper


Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Global Rank Benchmark
Face Alignment COFW HIH w. MSE(2 stack) NME (inter-ocular) 3.28% # 8
Face Alignment WFLW HIH w. MSE(2-stack) NME (inter-ocular) 4.18 # 11
AUC@10 (inter-ocular) 59.7 # 9
FR@10 (inter-ocular) 2.84 # 9

Methods