PropMix: Hard Sample Filtering and Proportional MixUp for Learning with Noisy Labels

22 Oct 2021  ยท  Filipe R. Cordeiro, Vasileios Belagiannis, Ian Reid, Gustavo Carneiro ยท

The most competitive noisy label learning methods rely on an unsupervised classification of clean and noisy samples, where samples classified as noisy are re-labelled and "MixMatched" with the clean samples. These methods have two issues in large noise rate problems: 1) the noisy set is more likely to contain hard samples that are in-correctly re-labelled, and 2) the number of samples produced by MixMatch tends to be reduced because it is constrained by the small clean set size. In this paper, we introduce the learning algorithm PropMix to handle the issues above. PropMix filters out hard noisy samples, with the goal of increasing the likelihood of correctly re-labelling the easy noisy samples. Also, PropMix places clean and re-labelled easy noisy samples in a training set that is augmented with MixUp, removing the clean set size constraint and including a large proportion of correctly re-labelled easy noisy samples. We also include self-supervised pre-training to improve robustness to high noisy label scenarios. Our experiments show that PropMix has state-of-the-art (SOTA) results on CIFAR-10/-100(with symmetric, asymmetric and semantic label noise), Red Mini-ImageNet (from the Controlled Noisy Web Labels), Clothing1M and WebVision. In severe label noise bench-marks, our results are substantially better than other methods. The code is available athttps://github.com/filipe-research/PropMix.

PDF Abstract
Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Global Rank Result Benchmark
Image Classification with Label Noise CIFAR-10 PropMix (Ours) Accuracy 94.89 # 1
Image Classification with Label Noise CIFAR-100 PropMix (Ours) Accuracy 58.57 # 1
Image Classification Red MiniImageNet 20% label noise PropMix Accuracy 61.24 # 2
Image Classification Red MiniImageNet 40% label noise PropMix Accuracy 56.22 # 3
Image Classification Red MiniImageNet 60% label noise PropMix Accuracy 52.84 # 2
Image Classification Red MiniImageNet 80% label noise PropMix Accuracy 43.42 # 3
Image Classification WebVision PropMix (Ours) Top 1 Accuracy 78.84 # 1

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here