PropagationNet: Propagate Points to Curve to Learn Structure Information

Deep learning technique has dramatically boosted the performance of face alignment algorithms. However, due to large variability and lack of samples, the alignment problem in unconstrained situations, \emph{e.g}\onedot large head poses, exaggerated expression, and uneven illumination, is still largely unsolved. In this paper, we explore the instincts and reasons behind our two proposals, \emph{i.e}\onedot Propagation Module and Focal Wing Loss, to tackle the problem. Concretely, we present a novel structure-infused face alignment algorithm based on heatmap regression via propagating landmark heatmaps to boundary heatmaps, which provide structure information for further attention map generation. Moreover, we propose a Focal Wing Loss for mining and emphasizing the difficult samples under in-the-wild condition. In addition, we adopt methods like CoordConv and Anti-aliased CNN from other fields that address the shift-variance problem of CNN for face alignment. When implementing extensive experiments on different benchmarks, \emph{i.e}\onedot WFLW, 300W, and COFW, our method outperforms state-of-the-arts by a significant margin. Our proposed approach achieves 4.05\% mean error on WFLW, 2.93\% mean error on 300W full-set, and 3.71\% mean error on COFW.

PDF Abstract CVPR 2020 PDF CVPR 2020 Abstract
No code implementations yet. Submit your code now

Datasets


Results from the Paper


Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Global Rank Result Benchmark
Face Alignment 300W PropNet NME_inter-ocular (%, Full) 2.93 # 5
NME_inter-ocular (%, Common) 2.67 # 10
NME_inter-ocular (%, Challenge) 3.99 # 1
NME_inter-pupil (%, Full) 4.1 # 6
NME_inter-pupil (%, Common) 3.7 # 9
NME_inter-pupil (%, Challenge) 5.75 # 1
Face Alignment COFW PropNet NME (inter-ocular) 3.71% # 16
Face Alignment WFLW PropNet NME (inter-ocular) 4.05 # 4
AUC@10 (inter-ocular) 61.58 # 3
FR@10 (inter-ocular) 2.96 # 12

Methods