Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network

Despite the breakthroughs in accuracy and speed of single image super-resolution using faster and deeper convolutional neural networks, one central problem remains largely unsolved: how do we recover the finer texture details when we super-resolve at large upscaling factors? The behavior of optimization-based super-resolution methods is principally driven by the choice of the objective function. Recent work has largely focused on minimizing the mean squared reconstruction error. The resulting estimates have high peak signal-to-noise ratios, but they are often lacking high-frequency details and are perceptually unsatisfying in the sense that they fail to match the fidelity expected at the higher resolution. In this paper, we present SRGAN, a generative adversarial network (GAN) for image super-resolution (SR). To our knowledge, it is the first framework capable of inferring photo-realistic natural images for 4x upscaling factors. To achieve this, we propose a perceptual loss function which consists of an adversarial loss and a content loss. The adversarial loss pushes our solution to the natural image manifold using a discriminator network that is trained to differentiate between the super-resolved images and original photo-realistic images. In addition, we use a content loss motivated by perceptual similarity instead of similarity in pixel space. Our deep residual network is able to recover photo-realistic textures from heavily downsampled images on public benchmarks. An extensive mean-opinion-score (MOS) test shows hugely significant gains in perceptual quality using SRGAN. The MOS scores obtained with SRGAN are closer to those of the original high-resolution images than to those obtained with any state-of-the-art method.

PDF Abstract CVPR 2017 PDF CVPR 2017 Abstract
Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Global Rank Result Benchmark
Image Super-Resolution BSD100 - 4x upscaling bicubic PSNR 25.94 # 53
SSIM 0.6935 # 46
MOS 1.47 # 5
Image Super-Resolution BSD100 - 4x upscaling SRResNet PSNR 27.58 # 25
SSIM 0.762 # 3
MOS 2.29 # 2
Image Super-Resolution BSD100 - 4x upscaling nearest neighbors PSNR 25.02 # 57
SSIM 0.6606 # 51
MOS 1.11 # 6
Image Super-Resolution BSD100 - 4x upscaling SRGAN PSNR 25.16 # 56
SSIM 0.6688 # 50
MOS 3.56 # 1
Image Super-Resolution FFHQ 1024 x 1024 - 4x upscaling SRGAN FID 60.67 # 8
MS-SSIM 0.807 # 8
PSNR 21.49 # 8
SSIM 0.515 # 8
Image Super-Resolution FFHQ 256 x 256 - 4x upscaling SRGAN FID 156.07 # 8
MS-SSIM 0.757 # 8
PSNR 17.57 # 9
SSIM 0.415 # 9
Image Super-Resolution FFHQ 512 x 512 - 4x upscaling SRGAN PSNR 27.494 # 6
SSIM 0.735 # 7
MS-SSIM 0.935 # 6
LLE 2.269 # 5
FED 0.1097 # 5
FID 4.396 # 3
LPIPS 0.1313 # 3
NIQE 7.378 # 3
Image Super-Resolution PIRM-test SRGAN NIQE 2.71 # 3
Image Super-Resolution Set14 - 4x upscaling SRGAN PSNR 25.99 # 79
SSIM 0.7397 # 69
MOS 3.72 # 1
Image Super-Resolution Set14 - 4x upscaling bicubic SSIM 0.7486 # 66
MOS 1.8 # 5
Image Super-Resolution Set14 - 4x upscaling nearest neighbors PSNR 24.64 # 81
SSIM 0.71 # 70
MOS 1.2 # 6
Image Super-Resolution Set14 - 4x upscaling SRResNet PSNR 28.49 # 43
SSIM 0.8184 # 2
MOS 2.98 # 2
Image Super-Resolution Set5 - 4x upscaling SRGAN PSNR 29.4 # 5
SSIM 0.8472 # 5
MOS 3.58 # 1

Results from Other Papers


Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Rank Source Paper Compare
Image Super-Resolution VggFace2 - 8x upscaling SRGAN PSNR 23.01 # 3
Image Super-Resolution WebFace - 8x upscaling SRGAN PSNR 24.49 # 3

Methods