Multiple Teachers-Meticulous Student: A Domain Adaptive Meta-Knowledge Distillation Model for Medical Image Classification

Background: Image classification can be considered one of the key pillars of medical image analysis. Deep learning (DL) faces challenges that prevent its practical applications despite the remarkable improvement in medical image classification. The data distribution differences can lead to a drop in the efficiency of DL, known as the domain shift problem. Besides, requiring bulk annotated data for model training, the large size of models, and the privacy-preserving of patients are other challenges of using DL in medical image classification. This study presents a strategy that can address the mentioned issues simultaneously. Method: The proposed domain adaptive model based on knowledge distillation can classify images by receiving limited annotated data of different distributions. The designed multiple teachers-meticulous student model trains a student network that tries to solve the challenges by receiving the parameters of several teacher networks. The proposed model was evaluated using six available datasets of different distributions by defining the respiratory motion artefact detection task. Results: The results of extensive experiments using several datasets show the superiority of the proposed model in addressing the domain shift problem and lack of access to bulk annotated data. Besides, the privacy preservation of patients by receiving only the teacher network parameters instead of the original data and consolidating the knowledge of several DL models into a model with almost similar performance are other advantages of the proposed model. Conclusions: The proposed model can pave the way for practical clinical applications of deep classification methods by achieving the mentioned objectives simultaneously.

PDF Abstract

Datasets


  Add Datasets introduced or used in this paper

Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods