FixNorm: Dissecting Weight Decay for Training Deep Neural Networks

29 Mar 2021  ·  Yucong Zhou, Yunxiao Sun, Zhao Zhong ·

Weight decay is a widely used technique for training Deep Neural Networks(DNN). It greatly affects generalization performance but the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Recent works show that for layers followed by normalizations, weight decay mainly affects the effective learning rate. However, despite normalizations have been extensively adopted in modern DNNs, layers such as the final fully-connected layer do not satisfy this precondition. For these layers, the effects of weight decay are still unclear. In this paper, we comprehensively investigate the mechanisms of weight decay and find that except for influencing effective learning rate, weight decay has another distinct mechanism that is equally important: affecting generalization performance by controlling cross-boundary risk. These two mechanisms together give a more comprehensive explanation for the effects of weight decay. Based on this discovery, we propose a new training method called FixNorm, which discards weight decay and directly controls the two mechanisms. We also propose a simple yet effective method to tune hyperparameters of FixNorm, which can find near-optimal solutions in a few trials. On ImageNet classification task, training EfficientNet-B0 with FixNorm achieves 77.7%, which outperforms the original baseline by a clear margin. Surprisingly, when scaling MobileNetV2 to the same FLOPS and applying the same tricks with EfficientNet-B0, training with FixNorm achieves 77.4%, which is only 0.3% lower. A series of SOTA results show the importance of well-tuned training procedures, and further verify the effectiveness of our approach. We set up more well-tuned baselines using FixNorm, to facilitate fair comparisons in the community.

PDF Abstract
No code implementations yet. Submit your code now

Tasks


Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods