Federated Bandit: A Gossiping Approach

24 Oct 2020  ·  Zhaowei Zhu, Jingxuan Zhu, Ji Liu, Yang Liu ·

In this paper, we study \emph{Federated Bandit}, a decentralized Multi-Armed Bandit problem with a set of $N$ agents, who can only communicate their local data with neighbors described by a connected graph $G$. Each agent makes a sequence of decisions on selecting an arm from $M$ candidates, yet they only have access to local and potentially biased feedback/evaluation of the true reward for each action taken. Learning only locally will lead agents to sub-optimal actions while converging to a no-regret strategy requires a collection of distributed data. Motivated by the proposal of federated learning, we aim for a solution with which agents will never share their local observations with a central entity, and will be allowed to only share a private copy of his/her own information with their neighbors. We first propose a decentralized bandit algorithm Gossip_UCB, which is a coupling of variants of both the classical gossiping algorithm and the celebrated Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) bandit algorithm. We show that Gossip_UCB successfully adapts local bandit learning into a global gossiping process for sharing information among connected agents, and achieves guaranteed regret at the order of $O(\max\{ \texttt{poly}(N,M) \log T, \texttt{poly}(N,M)\log_{\lambda_2^{-1}} N\})$ for all $N$ agents, where $\lambda_2\in(0,1)$ is the second largest eigenvalue of the expected gossip matrix, which is a function of $G$. We then propose Fed_UCB, a differentially private version of Gossip_UCB, in which the agents preserve $\epsilon$-differential privacy of their local data while achieving $O(\max \{\frac{\texttt{poly}(N,M)}{\epsilon}\log^{2.5} T, \texttt{poly}(N,M) (\log_{\lambda_2^{-1}} N + \log T) \})$ regret.

PDF Abstract
No code implementations yet. Submit your code now

Datasets


  Add Datasets introduced or used in this paper

Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here