Data Augmentation for Enhancing EEG-based Emotion Recognition with Deep Generative Models

4 Jun 2020  ·  Yun Luo, Li-Zhen Zhu, Zi-Yu Wan, Bao-liang Lu ·

The data scarcity problem in emotion recognition from electroencephalography (EEG) leads to difficulty in building an affective model with high accuracy using machine learning algorithms or deep neural networks. Inspired by emerging deep generative models, we propose three methods for augmenting EEG training data to enhance the performance of emotion recognition models. Our proposed methods are based on two deep generative models, variational autoencoder (VAE) and generative adversarial network (GAN), and two data augmentation strategies. For the full usage strategy, all of the generated data are augmented to the training dataset without judging the quality of the generated data, while for partial usage, only high-quality data are selected and appended to the training dataset. These three methods are called conditional Wasserstein GAN (cWGAN), selective VAE (sVAE), and selective WGAN (sWGAN). To evaluate the effectiveness of these methods, we perform a systematic experimental study on two public EEG datasets for emotion recognition, namely, SEED and DEAP. We first generate realistic-like EEG training data in two forms: power spectral density and differential entropy. Then, we augment the original training datasets with a different number of generated realistic-like EEG data. Finally, we train support vector machines and deep neural networks with shortcut layers to build affective models using the original and augmented training datasets. The experimental results demonstrate that the augmented training datasets produced by our methods enhance the performance of EEG-based emotion recognition models and outperform the existing data augmentation methods such as conditional VAE, Gaussian noise, and rotational data augmentation.

PDF Abstract

Datasets


Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods