Contrastive Tuning: A Little Help to Make Masked Autoencoders Forget

Masked Image Modeling (MIM) methods, like Masked Autoencoders (MAE), efficiently learn a rich representation of the input. However, for adapting to downstream tasks, they require a sufficient amount of labeled data since their rich features code not only objects but also less relevant image background. In contrast, Instance Discrimination (ID) methods focus on objects. In this work, we study how to combine the efficiency and scalability of MIM with the ability of ID to perform downstream classification in the absence of large amounts of labeled data. To this end, we introduce Masked Autoencoder Contrastive Tuning (MAE-CT), a sequential approach that utilizes the implicit clustering of the Nearest Neighbor Contrastive Learning (NNCLR) objective to induce abstraction in the topmost layers of a pre-trained MAE. MAE-CT tunes the rich features such that they form semantic clusters of objects without using any labels. Notably, MAE-CT does not rely on hand-crafted augmentations and frequently achieves its best performances while using only minimal augmentations (crop & flip). Further, MAE-CT is compute efficient as it requires at most 10% overhead compared to MAE re-training. Applied to large and huge Vision Transformer (ViT) models, MAE-CT excels over previous self-supervised methods trained on ImageNet in linear probing, k-NN and low-shot classification accuracy as well as in unsupervised clustering accuracy. With ViT-H/16 MAE-CT achieves a new state-of-the-art in linear probing of 82.2%.

PDF Abstract

Datasets


Results from the Paper


 Ranked #1 on Image Clustering on Imagenet-dog-15 (using extra training data)

     Get a GitHub badge
Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Global Rank Uses Extra
Training Data
Result Benchmark
Image Clustering ImageNet MAE-CT (ViT-H/16 best) NMI 81.8 # 4
Accuracy 58.0 # 4
Image Clustering ImageNet MAE-CT (ViT-H/16 mean) NMI 81.7 # 5
Accuracy 57.1 # 6
Self-Supervised Image Classification ImageNet MAE-CT (ViT-L/16 Top 1 Accuracy 81.5% # 15
Number of Params 307M # 16
Self-Supervised Image Classification ImageNet MAE-CT (ViT-H/16) Top 1 Accuracy 82.2% # 12
Number of Params 632M # 6
Image Clustering Imagenet-dog-15 MAE-CT (best) Accuracy 0.943 # 1
NMI 0.904 # 1
ARI 0.879 # 1
Backbone ViT-H/16 # 1
Image Size 224 # 1
Image Clustering Imagenet-dog-15 MAE-CT (mean) Accuracy 0.874 # 2
NMI 0.882 # 2
ARI 0.821 # 2
Backbone ViT-H/16 # 1
Image Size 224 # 1

Methods