Comparing Humans, GPT-4, and GPT-4V On Abstraction and Reasoning Tasks

14 Nov 2023 · Melanie Mitchell, Alessandro B. Palmarini, Arseny Moskvichev ·

We explore the abstract reasoning abilities of text-only and multimodal versions of GPT-4, using the ConceptARC benchmark [10], which is designed to evaluate robust understanding and reasoning with core-knowledge concepts. We extend the work of Moskvichev et al. [10] by evaluating GPT-4 on more detailed, one-shot prompting (rather than simple, zero-shot prompts) with text versions of ConceptARC tasks, and by evaluating GPT-4V, the multimodal version of GPT-4, on zero- and one-shot prompts using image versions of the simplest tasks. Our experimental results support the conclusion that neither version of GPT-4 has developed robust abstraction abilities at humanlike levels.

PDF Abstract

Code

Add Remove Mark official

No code implementations yet. Submit your code now

Tasks

Add Remove

Datasets

ConceptARC

Results from the Paper

Edit

Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods

Add Remove

Absolute Position Encodings • Adam • BPE • Dense Connections • Dropout • GPT-4 • Label Smoothing • Layer Normalization • Linear Layer • Multi-Head Attention • Position-Wise Feed-Forward Layer • Residual Connection • Scaled Dot-Product Attention • Softmax • Transformer

Edit Social Preview

Comparing Humans, GPT-4, and GPT-4V On Abstraction and Reasoning Tasks

Code Edit Add Remove Mark official

Tasks Edit Add Remove

Datasets Edit

Results from the Paper Edit

Methods Edit Add Remove

Code

Add Remove Mark official

Tasks

Add Remove

Datasets

Results from the Paper

Edit

Methods

Add Remove