Best of Both Worlds: Transferring Knowledge from Discriminative Learning to a Generative Visual Dialog Model

We present a novel training framework for neural sequence models, particularly for grounded dialog generation. The standard training paradigm for these models is maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), or minimizing the cross-entropy of the human responses. Across a variety of domains, a recurring problem with MLE trained generative neural dialog models (G) is that they tend to produce 'safe' and generic responses ("I don't know", "I can't tell"). In contrast, discriminative dialog models (D) that are trained to rank a list of candidate human responses outperform their generative counterparts; in terms of automatic metrics, diversity, and informativeness of the responses. However, D is not useful in practice since it cannot be deployed to have real conversations with users. Our work aims to achieve the best of both worlds -- the practical usefulness of G and the strong performance of D -- via knowledge transfer from D to G. Our primary contribution is an end-to-end trainable generative visual dialog model, where G receives gradients from D as a perceptual (not adversarial) loss of the sequence sampled from G. We leverage the recently proposed Gumbel-Softmax (GS) approximation to the discrete distribution -- specifically, an RNN augmented with a sequence of GS samplers, coupled with the straight-through gradient estimator to enable end-to-end differentiability. We also introduce a stronger encoder for visual dialog, and employ a self-attention mechanism for answer encoding along with a metric learning loss to aid D in better capturing semantic similarities in answer responses. Overall, our proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art on the VisDial dataset by a significant margin (2.67% on recall@10). The source code can be downloaded from https://github.com/jiasenlu/visDial.pytorch.

PDF Abstract NeurIPS 2017 PDF NeurIPS 2017 Abstract

Results from the Paper


Results from Other Papers


Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Rank Source Paper Compare
Visual Dialog VisDial v0.9 val HCIAE-NP-ATT MRR 62.22 # 8
Mean Rank 4.81 # 13
R@1 48.48 # 14
R@10 87.59 # 13
R@5 78.75 # 13

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here