An Interpretable Evaluation of Entropy-based Novelty of Generative Models

The massive developments of generative model frameworks and architectures require principled methods for the evaluation of a model's novelty compared to a reference dataset or baseline generative models. While the recent literature has extensively studied the evaluation of the quality, diversity, and generalizability of generative models, the assessment of a model's novelty compared to a baseline model has not been adequately studied in the machine learning community. In this work, we focus on the novelty assessment under multi-modal generative models and attempt to answer the following question: Given the samples of a generative model $\mathcal{G}$ and a reference dataset $\mathcal{S}$, how can we discover and count the modes expressed by $\mathcal{G}$ more frequently than in $\mathcal{S}$. We introduce a spectral approach to the described task and propose the Kernel-based Entropic Novelty (KEN) score to quantify the mode-based novelty of distribution $P_\mathcal{G}$ with respect to distribution $P_\mathcal{S}$. We analytically interpret the behavior of the KEN score under mixture distributions with sub-Gaussian components. Next, we develop a method based on Cholesky decomposition to compute the KEN score from observed samples. We support the KEN-based quantification of novelty by presenting several numerical results on synthetic and real image distributions. Our numerical results indicate the success of the proposed approach in detecting the novel modes and the comparison of state-of-the-art generative models.